In
The Talking Palm, nineteen-year old Sheryl is planning to get
married, but she is very frustrated. Neither she nor her family can
invite their relatives or friends to her wedding. According to
Sheryl's fiancé, Marvin,
Sheryl's associates are not religious folks (130-138).
Yet,
Sheryl or her family do not resist Marvin's demand or ask him to
reciprocate. Instead, they grudgingly comply but complain behind
his back.
When
Sheryl blindly obeys Marvin's demand without holding a serious
discussion or calling for mutual compromise, is she setting up the
stage for a disastrous relationship? Has she created an unhealthy
template of how her husband should treat her in the future?
Does
Sheryl's misery about her decision to comply while simultaneously
feeling powerless to direct her path show a fundamental flaw in
Sheryl's character? Isn't she morally obligated to nurture her soul,
which in turn will enhance the quality of her relationships? Is
Sheryl mature enough to make right decisions for her good?
What
do you think?
By Esther Jno-Charles
By Esther Jno-Charles
No comments:
Post a Comment